Comments

$1.2bn Malabu Oil Scam: How Confusion From EFCC Stalled Adoke's Arraignment

Mohammed Adoke

According to The Nation, the arraignment of former Attorney-General and Minister of Justice, Mohammed Adoke was on Wednesday, stalled at the FCT High Court in Gwagwalada over confusion from the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission,(EFCC) the prosecuting agency.

The EFCC counsel Bala Sanga told the court that he did not know why he was in court.

“My Lord, we have not served the charge on the first, second and third defendant, we have only served the fifth, sixth and seventh defendants.

“I’m at a loss as to why we are here(in court)’’, Sanga said.

The prosecutor further told the court that the second defendant, Aliyu Abubakar was on the run and the commission had to set up a 24-hour manhunt for him.

He added that the commission had intended to arraign all the seven defendants on Jan. 24 after effecting service on all of them.

“I am shocked as to why it came up today but subject to the convenience of the court, i ask for a short adjournment to enable us serve them’’.

Responding, counsel to Adoke, Mr Paul Erokoro, (SAN) confirmed that his client was yet to be served.

Erokoro, however, told the court that they were willing to waive service and proceed with the matter.

“It is true that the charge has not been handed to us, but we consider ourselves served and so we waive service and are ready to go on with the arraignment.

Moreover, the lawyer said that by virtue of Section 136 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, (ACJA), service was not necessary.

For his part, Mr Wole Olanipekun, (SAN), counsel to the second defendant, insisted that his client had been served.

Olanipekun also countered the argument of the prosecutor saying that his client had not been on the run and that in fact, his client was represented in court.

Mr Mahmud Magaji, (SAN), counsel to the third defendant, Rasky Gbinigie wondered why the anti-graft agency failed to serve the charge on his client who had been in their custody.

A representative of the fourth defendant, Nigeria Agip Exploration Ltd, however told the court that his client had yet to be served and that the counsel representing the fourth defendant was not in court.

The trial judge, Justice Abubakar Kutigi however, insisted that the law provided for every defendant to be served before plea would be taken.

He directed the prosecutor to serve the charge on all parties and also directed that all bail applications be served on all parties.

The judge adjourned the matter until Jan. 23 for arraignment.

News Agency of Nigeria, (NAN) recalls that the EFCC had filed criminal charges against Adoke over his alleged indictment in the Oil Propective Licence (OPL) 245.

The former Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice was on self exile for four years when the charges were slammed on him by the Federal Government.

The anti-graft agency accused the former justice minister of fraudulently allocating OPL 245.

The former justice minister was arrested on Dec.19 by the EFCC on arrival to the country and has been in its custody since then.
Mohammed Adoke

According to The Nation, the arraignment of former Attorney-General and Minister of Justice, Mohammed Adoke was on Wednesday, stalled at the FCT High Court in Gwagwalada over confusion from the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission,(EFCC) the prosecuting agency.

The EFCC counsel Bala Sanga told the court that he did not know why he was in court.

“My Lord, we have not served the charge on the first, second and third defendant, we have only served the fifth, sixth and seventh defendants.

“I’m at a loss as to why we are here(in court)’’, Sanga said.

The prosecutor further told the court that the second defendant, Aliyu Abubakar was on the run and the commission had to set up a 24-hour manhunt for him.

He added that the commission had intended to arraign all the seven defendants on Jan. 24 after effecting service on all of them.

“I am shocked as to why it came up today but subject to the convenience of the court, i ask for a short adjournment to enable us serve them’’.

Responding, counsel to Adoke, Mr Paul Erokoro, (SAN) confirmed that his client was yet to be served.

Erokoro, however, told the court that they were willing to waive service and proceed with the matter.

“It is true that the charge has not been handed to us, but we consider ourselves served and so we waive service and are ready to go on with the arraignment.

Moreover, the lawyer said that by virtue of Section 136 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, (ACJA), service was not necessary.

For his part, Mr Wole Olanipekun, (SAN), counsel to the second defendant, insisted that his client had been served.

Olanipekun also countered the argument of the prosecutor saying that his client had not been on the run and that in fact, his client was represented in court.

Mr Mahmud Magaji, (SAN), counsel to the third defendant, Rasky Gbinigie wondered why the anti-graft agency failed to serve the charge on his client who had been in their custody.

A representative of the fourth defendant, Nigeria Agip Exploration Ltd, however told the court that his client had yet to be served and that the counsel representing the fourth defendant was not in court.

The trial judge, Justice Abubakar Kutigi however, insisted that the law provided for every defendant to be served before plea would be taken.

He directed the prosecutor to serve the charge on all parties and also directed that all bail applications be served on all parties.

The judge adjourned the matter until Jan. 23 for arraignment.

News Agency of Nigeria, (NAN) recalls that the EFCC had filed criminal charges against Adoke over his alleged indictment in the Oil Propective Licence (OPL) 245.

The former Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice was on self exile for four years when the charges were slammed on him by the Federal Government.

The anti-graft agency accused the former justice minister of fraudulently allocating OPL 245.

The former justice minister was arrested on Dec.19 by the EFCC on arrival to the country and has been in its custody since then.
Facebook Blogger Plugin by BOBOJAY | INSTAGRAM

CONTACT US FOR NEWS AND ADVERTISEMENT!

Official e-mail: isaacifeanyi47@ gmail.com

$1.2bn Malabu Oil Scam: How Confusion From EFCC Stalled Adoke's Arraignment $1.2bn Malabu Oil Scam: How Confusion From EFCC Stalled Adoke's Arraignment Reviewed by YOUNG-PRINCE on January 22, 2020 Rating: 5

No comments:

Like NCGBASE On Facebook